Free Newsletter
Register for our Free Newsletters
Newsletter
Zones
Advanced Composites
LeftNav
Aerospace
LeftNav
Amorphous Metal Structures
LeftNav
Analysis and Simulation
LeftNav
Asbestos and Substitutes
LeftNav
Associations, Research Organisations and Universities
LeftNav
Automation Equipment
LeftNav
Automotive
LeftNav
Biomaterials
LeftNav
Building Materials
LeftNav
Bulk Handling and Storage
LeftNav
CFCs and Substitutes
LeftNav
Company
LeftNav
Components
LeftNav
Consultancy
LeftNav
View All
Other Carouselweb publications
Carousel Web
Defense File
New Materials
Pro Health Zone
Pro Manufacturing Zone
Pro Security Zone
Web Lec
Pro Engineering Zone
 
 
 
News

Study shows donating a kidney does not benefit seller

Case Western Reserve University : 09 February, 2007  (Technical Article)
Individuals who sell a kidney do not receive a long-term economic benefit from the sale and may have a worsening of their health, according to a new study in The Journal of the American Medical Association.
The investigation led by Madhav Goyal from Geisinger Health System in State College, Pa., and Ashwini Sehgal from the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine involved 305 individuals in southern India who had sold a kidney an average of six years earlier for about $1,000 apiece (about twice their annual family income).

The study compared the sellers' current economic and health status with their economic and health status before they sold a kidney. The income of the sellers declined by one-third after selling a kidney, and 86 percent had a worsening of their health status.

Because nearly every country has a shortage of organs for transplantation, providing financial incentives to donate is often proposed or justified as a way to benefit recipients by increasing the supply of organs and to benefit donors by improving their economic status.

In the United States, most organs for transplantation come from brain dead individuals whose families have consented to donate. Providing financial incentives such as payment for funeral expenses has been proposed as a way to increase the supply of organs.

In many developing countries such as India, most organs come from living donors, and the sale of kidneys is widespread. This practice is justified as a way to both increase the supply of kidneys for transplantation and to benefit the seller economically. However, critics argue that purchasing kidneys amounts to exploitation of the poor and that the poor do not overcome poverty as a result of the sale.

The researchers also sought to determine whether individuals who sell a kidney actually benefit from the sale.

'We were surprised by our findings,' Goyal said. 'The sellers' economic and health status appeared to worsen after selling a kidney. Most of them would not recommend that others sell a kidney.'

'These findings undercut arguments in favor of financial incentives,' Sehgal said. 'Even modest financial incentives such as those proposed in the United States may be perceived by the general public as taking advantage of poor families. If this happens, such incentives may actually lead to fewer total organ donations.'

Goyal is an internist at Geisinger Health System. Sehgal is an associate professor of medicine, biomedical ethics and epidemiology and biostatistics at CWRU and a member of the division of nephrology and Center for Health Care Research and Policy at MetroHealth Medical Center.

Other collaborators include Ravindra Mehta of the division of nephrology, and Lawrence Schneiderman of the departments of medicine and family and preventive medicine, at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.
Bookmark and Share
 
Home I Editor's Blog I News by Zone I News by Date I News by Category I Special Reports I Directory I Events I Advertise I Submit Your News I About Us I Guides
 
   © 2012 NewMaterials.com
Netgains Logo