CARNEGIE MELLON RESEARCHERS LAUNCH NEW CENTER TO DELIVER NERVOUS SYSTEMS FOR CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES

Main Menu | News By Date | News By Supplier | News By Category | About Us

CARNEGIE MELLON RESEARCHERS LAUNCH NEW CENTER TO DELIVER NERVOUS SYSTEMS FOR CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES
11 August 2006 - Carnegie Mellon Universtity

Carnegie Mellon University professors James H. Garrett Jr. and Jose M.F. Moura will head a new research center that will perform enabling research aimed at delivering cost-effective, sensor-based monitoring systems for a broad range of critical infrastructure applications. These monitoring systems could be used for decaying bridges, oil and gas pipelines, unstable electric power grids, leaking water distribution systems, and ensuring the security of a university campus.

To avoid costly failures and provide a 21st century infrastructure, the United States and other governments must build their critical infrastructures with a "nervous system" that collects and feeds data to places in the system that interpret it and allow better decision making, according to Carnegie Mellon researchers.

The Center for Sensed Critical Infrastructure Research will bring together a multidisciplinary team of experts committed to creating new fast, reliable monitoring systems to collect and process data about a myriad of complex network systems critical to both the nation's security and daily commerce, according to Garrett, associate dean of the College of Engineering and a professor of civil and environmental engineering. "CenSCIR will perform research that will clarify the need for, provide design guidance for, and justify providing critical infrastructure systems with sensor-based awareness of usage and condition, and proactive, intelligent decision support and control over a lifetime," Garrett said.

"We are interested in dynamic networks where survivability, reliability and stability are a primary concern," said Moura, a professor of electrical and computer engineering. "We plan to study and develop mechanisms to help detect attacks or problematic conditions throughout complex and aging infrastructure networks that may lead to catastrophic behavior, such as the power blackout of August 2003 that affected more than 50 million people in the northeastern United States."

America's trillion-dollar network of roads, bridges, water distribution systems, telecommunication systems and power distribution networks have varying amounts of automated monitoring and control. Some infrastructure systems already have significant monitoring in place, such as the electric power grid, while other infrastructures, like oil pipelines or highway bridges, use very little sensing and rely only on biannual visual inspections.

"Enabled by high levels of electronic integration, sensor technology has had major developments in the last few years that allow a quarter-size device to have the ability to sense temperature, humidity, take pictures, or measure the levels of a pollutant, extract useful information from this sensor data, and then radio it to other sensors or decision makers," Moura said. "Sensor networks provide the opportunity to be continuously alert. CenSCIR's activities will range from building the sensors to exploiting sensor networks in the context of large-scale critical infrastructures by developing the intelligence that can make the best use from this highly distributed information."

To achieve these goals, CenSCIR will bring together faculty with a broad range of expertise from nanodevices to controls, biometrics, computer networks and various application domains.

What CenSCIR researchers envision for critical infrastructure systems is similar to the human nervous system, where various senses feed valuable data to be processed for instant use or future reference.

"We want our infrastructure systems to sense aches and pains due to attacks or deterioration, and proactively (or reactively) cause some form of response in a more timely manner than we currently see," said Garrett.

The center's mission will be to better understand the needs and economic justifications for such data-driven decision support systems for critical infrastructure; to research the infrastructure-related issues for component technologies in sensing, data management, and decision support and control; to develop and validate prototype decision support systems for specific critical infrastructure applications; and to develop tools to help in creating these decision support tools. For example, Carnegie Mellon researchers are developing a new form of sensor that is able to both monitor material for anomalies and do self-diagnosis. The researchers are using these sensors to monitor the structural elements of Buffalo Creek Bridge, about 30 miles north of Pittsburgh.

CenSCIR will be administratively housed in Carnegie Mellon's Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, where researchers from the university and different departments within the College of Engineering collaborate on interdisciplinary research problems. Center funding will come from a mix of government grants and the private sector.

"This new center enables us to address a broad range of challenges by proactive monitoring, discovering and preventing critical behavior in complex infrastructure systems," said Cristina H. Amon, ICES director and the Lane Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon. "CenSCIR will also focus the innovative talents of a larger number of university researchers and disciplines to give us an even stronger presence in the corporate and industrial world, where our problem-solving expertise and cutting-edge applied research is so essential."

Burcu Akinci, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering, said the new center will help showcase research that leverages sensing, starting from the construction phase (cradle) all the way to the decommissioning phase (grave) of critical infrastructures.

CenSCIR will involve researchers from the departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Engineering and Public Policy, the schools of Architecture and Computer Science, and ICES. The center also will significantly interact with a number of important Carnegie Mellon labs and research centers.

http://www.cmu.edu

About: Carnegie Mellon Universtity
The Carnegie Institution of Washington (www.carnegieinstitution.org) has been a pioneering force in basic scientific research since 1902. It is a private, nonprofit organization with six research departments throughout the U.S. Carnegie scientists are leaders in plant biology, developmental biology, astronomy, materials science, global ecology, and Earth and planetary science.

Since its founding in 1900 by industrialist and philanthropist Andrew Carnegie, Carnegie Mellon University has been a pragmatic institution, adapting rapidly to change. In fewer than 100 years it has changed its name three times--each transition marking a milestone in the institution's 20th century evolution.

Whether it was Carnegie Technical Schools, as it was in its first 12 years, Carnegie Institute of Technology, its name from 1912 to 1967, or Carnegie Mellon University, three primary purposes formed its foundation. Throughout this century, Carnegie Mellon has focused on delivering distinctive and first-quality education, fostering research, creativity and discovery, and using the new knowledge created on campus to serve our larger society.

When Arthur A. Hamerschlag served as the school's first president, Carnegie Technical Schools' 12 professors and six administrators sought to educate the sons and daughters of Pittsburgh workers for employment in the region's growing industries.

These educators served the vision of Carnegie by organizing into four faculties: the School of Science and Technology, the School of Fine and Applied Arts, the School of Apprentices and Journeymen, and the Margaret Morrison Carnegie School for Women.

In its earliest years, the institution served primarily part-time and undergraduate students. The faculty, many of whom did not have doctor's degrees, focused on teaching and curriculum development.

But research efforts began as early as 1916 when the Division of Applied Psychology of the Carnegie Institute of Technology developed rating scales for job placement. This rating system was used to classify two million men for placement in the armed forces during World War I. Research bureaus were organized in coal mining, nuclear physics, applied chemistry and metallurgy.

And by granting the nation's first undergraduate degree in drama in 1917, the institution began a tradition of leadership in the arts that spanned the century.

Through research and the education of its students during the administration of President Thomas S. Baker in the 1920s and '30s, the institution began its strong tradition of transferring knowledge and skills to industry and government.

Building on this firm foundation, the administration of President Robert E. Doherty introduced a new approach to education that would be used as a model by similar institutions around the nation. The Carnegie Plan for Professional Education, initiated in 1939-40, required engineering and science students to take a quarter of their courses in a new Humanistic and Social Relations sequence. In addition, its curriculum focused on teaching students problem-solving techniques, a hallmark of the Carnegie Mellon educational experience today.

While the Doherty administration has been credited with this educational innovation, it also oversaw growth in the institution's research capability. Between 1936 and 1950, the number of graduate students grew from 36 to more than 260. The research budget ballooned from $156,000 to $1 million.

In the 1950s, the newly formed Graduate School of Industrial Administration, endowed by William Larimer Mellon, emerged as one of the three or four best business schools in the nation. (In 2004 the school was renamed the David A. Tepper School of Business after benefactor and alumnus David Tepper (MBA '82).) Today, the school is recognized as a pioneer in the field of management science and one of the top business schools in the world.

The Warner administration oversaw the institution's burgeoning research enterprise. This period of research growth was aided by the work of the institution's Computation Center, founded in 1956 to provide computing services to the campus. A major grant from benefactor Richard K. Mellon in 1965 aided the establishment of a Computer Science Department, a department which would be the genesis of Carnegie Mellon's worldwide reputation in computer science.

By the end of the Warner administration and the start of the administration of President H. Guyford Stever in 1966, Carnegie Tech had most elements of a university. Its merger in 1967 with the Mellon Institute created Carnegie Mellon University and brought a $60 million endowment, extensive research facilities and renowned research personnel to the institution.

Five years later, President Richard M. Cyert (1972-90) began a tenure that was characterized by unparalleled growth and development. The university's research budget soared from about $12 million annually in the early 1970s to more than $110 million in the late 1980s. The work of researchers in new fields such as robotics and software engineering helped the university build on its reputation for innovative ideas and pragmatic solutions to the problems of industry and society. Carnegie Mellon began to be recognized as a truly national research university able to attract students from across the nation and around the world.

The Cyert administration stressed strategic planning and comparative advantage, pursuing opportunities in areas in which Carnegie Mellon could outdistance its competitors.

An archetypal example of this approach was the introduction of the university's "Andrew" computing network in the mid-1980s. This pioneering network, which linked all computers and workstations on campus, set the standard for educational computing and firmly established the university as a leader in the uses of technology in education and research.

Education and teaching also benefited in this period with the establishment of a University Teaching Center to improve faculty teaching and the renovation of many of the university's classrooms.

Cognizant of the university's heritage, President Robert Mehrabian (1990-97) invited alumni from the era of the institution's first president, Arthur A. Hamerschlag, to attend his inauguration in 1990. President Mehrabian emphasized Carnegie Mellon's traditional strengths in education, research and service to society while focusing on initiatives for leadership in the 21st century.

With the appointment of the university's first Vice Provost for Education, President Mehrabian placed renewed emphasis early in his administration on the quality of undergraduate education. He also moved aggressively to complete the most ambitious campus building plan since the Warner era. The University Center, which opened in August 1996, and the Purnell Center for the Arts, to be completed by the fall of 1999, are keys to enhancing the quality of life on campus, another priority of the Mehrabian administration.

Confronted by shrinking governmental support of university research, President Mehrabian diversified the university's research agenda. He stressed the need to build strong relationships with the business world, matching industry's needs with the university's areas of research strength. He also put new emphasis on productivity, improvement of administrative services and strategic management of university resources.

President Mehrabian established strong, new partnerships with the greater Pittsburgh community. He led a community-wide economic development initiative, spurred collaboration with primary and secondary schools, and worked closely with local community groups.

On April 15, 1997, Jared L. Cohon, former dean of Yale University's School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, was elected by the university's Board of Trustees to succeed President Mehrabian, who resigned to spend more time with his family in California.

"Since I was chosen, since this wonderful event has occurred, it has made me reflect on why you are choosing me," President Cohon said in his first speech to the university community. "And I've said to people since this was announced that the more I think about it, the more I realize how well I think this institution and I fit together. We'll see if that's true. I think it is.

"When I was at Johns Hopkins we used to always hold up Carnegie Mellon as an example," Cohon said. "So, for many years I've ... been jealous of what has been accomplished here across departmental lines. I celebrate that. I think it is so valuable in every aspect of this university and it will position Carnegie Mellon to be even better...."

During Cohon's presidency, Carnegie Mellon has continued its trajectory of innovation and growth. Today, President Cohon is leading implementation of a comprehensive strategic plan that aims to leverage the university's existing strengths to benefit society in the areas of biotechnology and the life sciences, information and security technology, environmental science and practices, the fine arts and humanities.

The university is also committed to broadening and enhancing undergraduate education to allow students to explore various disciplines while maintaining a core focus in their primary area of study. Realizing that today's graduates must understand international issues, Carnegie Mellon is committed to providing a global education for its students and is striving to expand its international offerings and to increase its presence on a global scale. Increasing diversity, in all aspects, and fostering the economic development of southwestern Pennsylvania, are also top priorities.

Over the years Carnegie Mellon's leaders have reflected Andrew Carnegie's original dedication and commitment to this institution. In his 1900 letter to the mayor of Pittsburgh establishing Carnegie Technical Schools, Andrew Carnegie wrote, "My heart is in the work." These words have been echoed by students, faculty and administrators throughout this century and they live on the Carnegie Mellon campus today.

More News:
  • For August 2006
  • From Carnegie Mellon Universtity
  • For University