Golfer247 - The latest news and products from the world of golf
Main Menu | News By Date | News By Supplier | News By Category | About Us
 

COUPLED WITH PREVIOUS STUDIES, FINDINGS SUGGEST TREATMENTS FOR AUTISM
04 August 2006 - Carnegie Mellon Universtity

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging scans, a team of scientists at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh have found differences in the activation and synchronization of brain networks between people with autism and those without it. These findings could yield strategies for treating autism, a mysterious brain disorder that impairs verbal and non-verbal communications and social interactions. The study will be published in the journal Neuroimage and will be available online November 29 at www.sciencedirect.com.

The research was conducted at Carnegie Mellon's Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging (CCBI) and was co-authored by Marcel Just, director of the center and the D.O. Hebb Professor of Psychology at Carnegie Mellon. The lead author was Hideya Koshino, an assistant professor of psychology at California State University at San Bernardino and a former postdoctoral fellow at the CCBI.

The study follows on the heels of groundbreaking research published by the CCBI in July that proposed the underconnectivity theory, which holds that autism is a system-wide brain disorder that limits the coordination and integration among brain areas. Because this type of coordination is critical to complex thinking and social interaction, a wide range of behaviors are affected in autism.

The current study compared a group of high-functioning adults with autism to a control group of normal participants with similar ages and IQs. Each participant saw a series of alphabet letters presented one at a time at the center of a computer screen, and they had to decide if the letter was the same as the previous letter, or in some cases, whether it was the same as the letter that was presented two letters previously.

Although the two groups performed the task equally well, the fMRI scans revealed three important differences in brain activation between them. First, the autism group showed more activation in the right hemisphere of the brain than the left, whereas the control group showed more activation in the left hemisphere than the right. The left hemisphere usually is associated with processing verbal information and the right hemisphere is associated with visual and spatial information processing. Since letters can be interpreted as verbal codes (letter names) or visual codes (letter shapes), the different uses of two hemispheres seem to correspond to a difference in strategies: The autism group likely remembered letters by their shape, while the control group remembered letter names.

A second difference was that the autism group showed less activation in the anterior parts (prefrontal regions) of the brain and more activation in the posterior parts than the control group. Working memory is usually associated with the prefrontal regions of the brain, and the control group showed a typical pattern of activation in the prefrontal regions, whereas the autism group showed weaker activation in the prefrontal regions. This pattern is consistent with previous findings in which people with autism group showed more activation in the posterior language area (Wernicke's area) than the anterior language area (Broca's area) during sentence comprehension.

The third difference was that the overall synchronization among the brain regions was weaker for the autism group than for the control group. The activated brain areas were also not as tightly organized into groups with similar synchronization in the case of the people with autism. The results were consistent with the underconnectivity theory. Taken together, the results of these and other autism studies suggest that possible treatments of autism might include instruction and training that focuses on the integration of the types of processing performed by different brain areas.

http://www.cmu.edu

About: Carnegie Mellon Universtity
The Carnegie Institution of Washington (www.carnegieinstitution.org) has been a pioneering force in basic scientific research since 1902. It is a private, nonprofit organization with six research departments throughout the U.S. Carnegie scientists are leaders in plant biology, developmental biology, astronomy, materials science, global ecology, and Earth and planetary science.

Since its founding in 1900 by industrialist and philanthropist Andrew Carnegie, Carnegie Mellon University has been a pragmatic institution, adapting rapidly to change. In fewer than 100 years it has changed its name three times--each transition marking a milestone in the institution's 20th century evolution.

Whether it was Carnegie Technical Schools, as it was in its first 12 years, Carnegie Institute of Technology, its name from 1912 to 1967, or Carnegie Mellon University, three primary purposes formed its foundation. Throughout this century, Carnegie Mellon has focused on delivering distinctive and first-quality education, fostering research, creativity and discovery, and using the new knowledge created on campus to serve our larger society.

When Arthur A. Hamerschlag served as the school's first president, Carnegie Technical Schools' 12 professors and six administrators sought to educate the sons and daughters of Pittsburgh workers for employment in the region's growing industries.

These educators served the vision of Carnegie by organizing into four faculties: the School of Science and Technology, the School of Fine and Applied Arts, the School of Apprentices and Journeymen, and the Margaret Morrison Carnegie School for Women.

In its earliest years, the institution served primarily part-time and undergraduate students. The faculty, many of whom did not have doctor's degrees, focused on teaching and curriculum development.

But research efforts began as early as 1916 when the Division of Applied Psychology of the Carnegie Institute of Technology developed rating scales for job placement. This rating system was used to classify two million men for placement in the armed forces during World War I. Research bureaus were organized in coal mining, nuclear physics, applied chemistry and metallurgy.

And by granting the nation's first undergraduate degree in drama in 1917, the institution began a tradition of leadership in the arts that spanned the century.

Through research and the education of its students during the administration of President Thomas S. Baker in the 1920s and '30s, the institution began its strong tradition of transferring knowledge and skills to industry and government.

Building on this firm foundation, the administration of President Robert E. Doherty introduced a new approach to education that would be used as a model by similar institutions around the nation. The Carnegie Plan for Professional Education, initiated in 1939-40, required engineering and science students to take a quarter of their courses in a new Humanistic and Social Relations sequence. In addition, its curriculum focused on teaching students problem-solving techniques, a hallmark of the Carnegie Mellon educational experience today.

While the Doherty administration has been credited with this educational innovation, it also oversaw growth in the institution's research capability. Between 1936 and 1950, the number of graduate students grew from 36 to more than 260. The research budget ballooned from $156,000 to $1 million.

In the 1950s, the newly formed Graduate School of Industrial Administration, endowed by William Larimer Mellon, emerged as one of the three or four best business schools in the nation. (In 2004 the school was renamed the David A. Tepper School of Business after benefactor and alumnus David Tepper (MBA '82).) Today, the school is recognized as a pioneer in the field of management science and one of the top business schools in the world.

The Warner administration oversaw the institution's burgeoning research enterprise. This period of research growth was aided by the work of the institution's Computation Center, founded in 1956 to provide computing services to the campus. A major grant from benefactor Richard K. Mellon in 1965 aided the establishment of a Computer Science Department, a department which would be the genesis of Carnegie Mellon's worldwide reputation in computer science.

By the end of the Warner administration and the start of the administration of President H. Guyford Stever in 1966, Carnegie Tech had most elements of a university. Its merger in 1967 with the Mellon Institute created Carnegie Mellon University and brought a $60 million endowment, extensive research facilities and renowned research personnel to the institution.

Five years later, President Richard M. Cyert (1972-90) began a tenure that was characterized by unparalleled growth and development. The university's research budget soared from about $12 million annually in the early 1970s to more than $110 million in the late 1980s. The work of researchers in new fields such as robotics and software engineering helped the university build on its reputation for innovative ideas and pragmatic solutions to the problems of industry and society. Carnegie Mellon began to be recognized as a truly national research university able to attract students from across the nation and around the world.

The Cyert administration stressed strategic planning and comparative advantage, pursuing opportunities in areas in which Carnegie Mellon could outdistance its competitors.

An archetypal example of this approach was the introduction of the university's "Andrew" computing network in the mid-1980s. This pioneering network, which linked all computers and workstations on campus, set the standard for educational computing and firmly established the university as a leader in the uses of technology in education and research.

Education and teaching also benefited in this period with the establishment of a University Teaching Center to improve faculty teaching and the renovation of many of the university's classrooms.

Cognizant of the university's heritage, President Robert Mehrabian (1990-97) invited alumni from the era of the institution's first president, Arthur A. Hamerschlag, to attend his inauguration in 1990. President Mehrabian emphasized Carnegie Mellon's traditional strengths in education, research and service to society while focusing on initiatives for leadership in the 21st century.

With the appointment of the university's first Vice Provost for Education, President Mehrabian placed renewed emphasis early in his administration on the quality of undergraduate education. He also moved aggressively to complete the most ambitious campus building plan since the Warner era. The University Center, which opened in August 1996, and the Purnell Center for the Arts, to be completed by the fall of 1999, are keys to enhancing the quality of life on campus, another priority of the Mehrabian administration.

Confronted by shrinking governmental support of university research, President Mehrabian diversified the university's research agenda. He stressed the need to build strong relationships with the business world, matching industry's needs with the university's areas of research strength. He also put new emphasis on productivity, improvement of administrative services and strategic management of university resources.

President Mehrabian established strong, new partnerships with the greater Pittsburgh community. He led a community-wide economic development initiative, spurred collaboration with primary and secondary schools, and worked closely with local community groups.

On April 15, 1997, Jared L. Cohon, former dean of Yale University's School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, was elected by the university's Board of Trustees to succeed President Mehrabian, who resigned to spend more time with his family in California.

"Since I was chosen, since this wonderful event has occurred, it has made me reflect on why you are choosing me," President Cohon said in his first speech to the university community. "And I've said to people since this was announced that the more I think about it, the more I realize how well I think this institution and I fit together. We'll see if that's true. I think it is.

"When I was at Johns Hopkins we used to always hold up Carnegie Mellon as an example," Cohon said. "So, for many years I've ... been jealous of what has been accomplished here across departmental lines. I celebrate that. I think it is so valuable in every aspect of this university and it will position Carnegie Mellon to be even better...."

During Cohon's presidency, Carnegie Mellon has continued its trajectory of innovation and growth. Today, President Cohon is leading implementation of a comprehensive strategic plan that aims to leverage the university's existing strengths to benefit society in the areas of biotechnology and the life sciences, information and security technology, environmental science and practices, the fine arts and humanities.

The university is also committed to broadening and enhancing undergraduate education to allow students to explore various disciplines while maintaining a core focus in their primary area of study. Realizing that today's graduates must understand international issues, Carnegie Mellon is committed to providing a global education for its students and is striving to expand its international offerings and to increase its presence on a global scale. Increasing diversity, in all aspects, and fostering the economic development of southwestern Pennsylvania, are also top priorities.

Over the years Carnegie Mellon's leaders have reflected Andrew Carnegie's original dedication and commitment to this institution. In his 1900 letter to the mayor of Pittsburgh establishing Carnegie Technical Schools, Andrew Carnegie wrote, "My heart is in the work." These words have been echoed by students, faculty and administrators throughout this century and they live on the Carnegie Mellon campus today.


More News:
  • For August 2006
  • From Carnegie Mellon Universtity
  • For University

 

©2008 New Materials International