Free Newsletter
Register for our Free Newsletters
Newsletter
Zones
Advanced Composites
LeftNav
Aerospace
LeftNav
Amorphous Metal Structures
LeftNav
Analysis and Simulation
LeftNav
Asbestos and Substitutes
LeftNav
Associations, Research Organisations and Universities
LeftNav
Automation Equipment
LeftNav
Automotive
LeftNav
Biomaterials
LeftNav
Building Materials
LeftNav
Bulk Handling and Storage
LeftNav
CFCs and Substitutes
LeftNav
Company
LeftNav
Components
LeftNav
Consultancy
LeftNav
View All
Other Carouselweb publications
Carousel Web
Defense File
New Materials
Pro Health Zone
Pro Manufacturing Zone
Pro Security Zone
Web Lec
Pro Engineering Zone
 
 
 
News

Does shortening of stay reduce or shift costs?

Boston University : 02 May, 2000  (Technical Article)
Hospitals may be saving money because coronary artery bypass surgery patients are being discharged sooner, but surgeons from Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center have shown that costs are actually being shifted to other health care providers.
Because CABG patients subsequently utilize outpatient nursing services and extended care facilities upon discharge from the hospital, or are quickly readmitted to the hospital, what appears to be cost savings is actually cost shifting.

These findings were presented today by Harold Lazar, MD, professor of cardiothoracic surgery at Boston University School of Medicine and a cardiothoracic surgeon at Boston Medical Center, at the 80th Annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, in Toronto, Canada.

Lazar and his colleagues compared patients who had undergone CABG surgery in 1990, when protocols to reduce length of stay were not in place with patients operated on in 1998 when these protocols were utilized. Despite the fact that the 1998 patients were sicker and had increased risk factors, they spent less time on ventilators and less time in the hospital, an average of 3.8 days less than those operated on in 1990. However, fewer 1998 patients were discharged to their homes. A higher percentage of these patients were discharged to extended care facilities, 43 percent in 1998 compared with only 3 percent of patients in 1990. In addition, patients operated on in 1998 were five times more likely to be readmitted to the hospital than those operated on in 1990.

'While protocols to reduce length of stay have resulted in earlier home discharge for good risk patients, it has also resulted in an increased utilization of ancillary services and extended care facilities for patients who cannot be discharged home,' said Lazar. 'Although it is entirely appropriate to utilize extended care facilities for patients who cannot be discharged home in a timely fashion, these facilities may actually consume more health care resources than in the hospital setting. Thus health care dollars hospitals saved from these patients are actually being spent by other health care agencies,' he adds.

Lazar recommends that in order to really decrease costs instead of simply shifting them, fast track protocols and critical pathways which have been so successful in reducing length of stay in a hospital setting, need to be instituted in extended care facilities.
Bookmark and Share
 
Home I Editor's Blog I News by Zone I News by Date I News by Category I Special Reports I Directory I Events I Advertise I Submit Your News I About Us I Guides
 
   © 2012 NewMaterials.com
Netgains Logo